Supreme Court Declines to Fast-Track Trump Ruling

Case will now head to Court of Appeals
By Newser Editors and Wire Services
Posted Dec 22, 2023 1:59 PM CST
Supreme Court Declines to Fast-Track Trump Ruling
The Supreme Court is shown in Washington, Monday, Dec. 18, 2023. The Supreme Court said Friday, Dec. 22, that it will not immediately take up a plea by special counsel Jack Smith to rule on whether former President Trump can be prosecuted for his actions to overturn the 2020 election results.   (AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib, File)

The Supreme Court said Friday that it will not immediately take up a plea by special counsel Jack Smith to rule on whether former President Trump can be prosecuted for his actions to overturn the 2020 election results, reports the AP. The issue will now be decided by the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which has signaled it will act quickly to decide the case. Special counsel Jack Smith had cautioned that even a rapid appellate decision might not get to the Supreme Court in time for review and final word before the court's traditional summer break. Smith had pressed the Supreme Court to intervene over concerns that the legal fight over the issue could delay the start of Trump's trial, now scheduled for March 4, beyond next year's presidential election.

US District Judge Tanya Chutkan has put the case on hold while Trump pursues his claim in higher courts that he is immune from prosecution. Chutkan raised the possibility of keeping the March date if the case promptly returns to her court. She already has rejected the Trump team's arguments that an ex-president could not be prosecuted over acts that fall within the official duties of the job. "Former presidents enjoy no special conditions on their federal criminal liability," Chutkan wrote in her Dec. 1 ruling. "Defendant may be subject to federal investigation, indictment, prosecution, conviction, and punishment for any criminal acts undertaken while in office."

The Supreme Court separately has agreed to hear a case over the charge of obstruction of an official proceeding that has been brought against Trump as well as more than 300 of his supporters who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. In the immunity case, Smith had tried to persuade the justices to take up the matter directly, bypassing the appeals court. "This case presents a fundamental question at the heart of our democracy: whether a former president is absolutely immune from federal prosecution for crimes committed while in office or is constitutionally protected from federal prosecution when he has been impeached but not convicted before the criminal proceedings begin," prosecutors wrote. (More US Supreme Court stories.)

Get breaking news in your inbox.
What you need to know, as soon as we know it.
Sign up
Get the news faster.
Tap to install our app.
X
Install the Newser News app
in two easy steps:
1. Tap in your navigation bar.
2. Tap to Add to Home Screen.

X