Politics / Republican Party Why the GOP Won't Fire Steele The turmoil and effort wouldn't be worth it By Gabriel Winant, Newser Staff Posted Mar 13, 2009 9:39 AM CDT Copied Former Ohio Sec. of State Ken Blackwell, a rival turned key supporter of Michael Steele, congratulates him on his victory. Blackwell has sharply criticized Steele's work at the RNC recently. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais) Practically nobody in the GOP seems happy with Michael Steele’s leadership at the Republican National Committee so far. But a revolution isn’t likely, writes the Washington Post's Chris Cillizza, for a few reasons: Soundly defeated in November and torn by rival factions, the “last thing the party needs now is further chaos at the top.” It was a victory for the GOP’s image to choose an African-American. Dumping him shortly thereafter “would send the exact wrong message about who the Republican Party is.” Who'd replace him? Steele was picked partly because he had some charisma, among a field of contenders “roundly panned as lacking any real star power.” It’s not easy to do anything on national party committees, which are “ruled by a series of arcane rules and procedures.” Steele actually seems to be getting his act together. His recent hires at the RNC “should quiet some of the chatter that the committee is off the rails.” (More Republican Party stories.) Report an error